U.S. Navy SEALs and Special Boat Teams: Maritime Special Operations in Great Power Competition
The world’s oceans have always been arenas of power. But in the second decade of the 21st century, something fundamental changed. After two decades of chasing insurgents through desert valleys and mountain passes, America’s most elite maritime warriors were told to pivot — sharply, urgently — back toward the sea. The reason was impossible to ignore: China and Russia were flexing military muscle in ways that demanded a completely different response.
For U.S. Navy SEALs and Special Boat Teams, this meant confronting a stark reality. The skill sets that had defined a generation of operators — kicking in doors, hunting terrorist networks, conducting village stability operations — were no longer sufficient for the emerging threat landscape. The era of Great Power Competition had arrived, and Naval Special Warfare needed to reinvent itself for it. As Rear Adm. H.W. Howard III, Commander of Naval Special Warfare Command, declared at the WEST 2021 conference in June of that year: “We are in a race for relevancy.”
This is the story of that race — what’s driving it, what it demands, and how the operators at the tip of America’s maritime spear are adapting to meet one of the most complex strategic challenges in a generation.
Understanding Naval Special Warfare: SEALs and SWCC
Before examining the strategic pivot, it helps to understand exactly who these forces are and what they bring to the fight.
Navy SEALs: The Maritime Tip of the Spear
SEALs — an acronym for Sea, Air, and Land — are the U.S. Navy’s primary special operations force. Organized under Naval Special Warfare Command (NSWC), a component of U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), SEAL Teams have historically been structured around 16-man platoons, though modern organization has evolved considerably with expanded teams and specialized units.
Their core mission set is remarkably broad:
– Direct Action (DA): Short-duration strikes against high-value targets — raids, ambushes, precision assaults on critical infrastructure.
– Special Reconnaissance (SR): Covert intelligence gathering well beyond the range or access of conventional forces.
– Unconventional Warfare (UW): Supporting resistance movements, insurgencies, or partner forces operating against adversaries.
– Foreign Internal Defense (FID): Training, advising, and assisting foreign military and security forces.
– Counter-Terrorism (CT): Preventing, deterring, and responding to terrorist threats — the dominant mission for over two decades post-9/11.
– Maritime Interdiction Operations (MIO): Boarding, searching, and seizing vessels to intercept contraband, enforce sanctions, or neutralize threats at sea.
What makes SEALs uniquely valuable is the combination of breadth and depth. These operators are trained to parachute from high altitude, conduct advanced combat diving, navigate complex urban terrain, and communicate in multiple languages — often within the same deployment.
Special Boat Teams and SWCC: The Maritime Mobility Experts
If SEALs are the blade, Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewmen (SWCC) are the delivery system — and they’re far more than just drivers. Founded on April 16, 1987, SWCC personnel operate and maintain some of the most sophisticated small surface combatant craft in the U.S. military inventory. They operate under the Special Boat Teams (SBTs) and are the maritime mobility specialists of Naval Special Warfare.
Their current craft inventory reflects the demands of modern operations:
– Combatant Craft Assault (CCA): High-speed rigid hull inflatable craft optimized for covert infiltration and exfiltration in shallow coastal waters.
– Combatant Craft Medium (CCM): A larger, more capable platform designed for extended patrol and support missions with heavier weapons systems.
– Special Operations Craft – Riverine (SOC-R): Purpose-built for inland waterway operations, combining speed, firepower, and shallow-draft capability.
SWCC’s mission set extends well beyond boat driving. Their roles include special reconnaissance support, Visit Board Search and Seizure (VBSS) operations, direct action support with organic firepower, and coastal interdiction. In the GPC era, their ability to insert and extract SOF teams covertly into denied or contested coastal environments has become more strategically valuable than ever.
The NSW Command Structure
Naval Special Warfare Command organizes its forces into Groups, with SEAL Teams falling under NSW Groups 1 and 2, SWCC under NSW Group 4, and specialized units handling submarine-delivered SEAL delivery vehicles, intelligence, and reserve components. This layered, modular structure allows NSW to task-organize rapidly, plugging teams into joint task forces, fleet formations, or interagency operations as the mission demands.
The Imperative of Great Power Competition
To understand why NSW is reinventing itself, you need to understand the strategic environment that’s demanding it.
Defining Great Power Competition
Great Power Competition (GPC) refers to the return of sustained strategic rivalry between the world’s most powerful states — specifically the United States versus China and Russia. This isn’t the terrorism-focused “small wars” era of the early 2000s. GPC involves advanced militaries, sophisticated weapons systems, integrated electronic warfare, and strategic competition across every domain: land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace.
The 2018 National Defense Strategy formalized this shift, explicitly naming China and Russia as the primary long-term threats to U.S. national security. For a command like NSW, which had spent 20 years optimizing for counter-terrorism, this was a fundamental course correction.
China’s Maritime Ambitions
China represents the most complex and comprehensive challenge. The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has undergone an extraordinary modernization, becoming the world’s largest navy by number of hulls. More critically, China has developed sophisticated Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) capabilities — a web of long-range missiles, advanced sensors, electronic warfare systems, and submarine forces designed to deny U.S. forces the ability to operate freely in the Western Pacific.
China’s strategy in the Indo-Pacific relies heavily on “gray zone” tactics: actions that fall below the threshold of conventional armed conflict but steadily advance strategic interests. These include island-building in the South China Sea, economic coercion of regional partners, coast guard and maritime militia harassment campaigns, and information operations. These are precisely the kinds of challenges that special operations forces — with their emphasis on irregular warfare, partner engagement, and precision action — are uniquely positioned to address.
Russia’s Maritime Posture
Russia presents a different but equally serious challenge. Moscow has invested heavily in its Northern Fleet and Baltic Sea forces, developing advanced submarine capabilities and long-range anti-ship missiles. Russia’s Arctic ambitions, hybrid warfare doctrine, and willingness to operate in the “gray zone” — as demonstrated repeatedly in Eastern Europe and the Middle East — require a response that goes beyond conventional naval power.
The Maritime Domain’s Centrality
Both China and Russia understand that maritime power is central to their strategic ambitions. For the United States, maintaining freedom of navigation, securing critical sea lines of communication, and supporting allies throughout littoral regions is non-negotiable. That’s exactly why Naval Special Warfare — the joint force’s primary maritime SOF element — finds itself at the center of the GPC adaptation effort.
NSW’s Strategic Adaptation: “Race for Relevancy”
When Rear Adm. Howard declared NSW’s “race for relevancy” in June 2021, he wasn’t being dramatic. He was being accurate. The command that had spent a generation defining itself through counter-terrorism excellence needed to demonstrate tangible value in a completely different strategic context.
Howard described this as potentially “the biggest transition since Vietnam” — a significant statement given that the shift from Vietnam-era unconventional warfare to Cold War special operations was itself a profound transformation. He outlined a strategic framework built around three lines of effort:
Line 1: Win the Current Fight
NSW hasn’t abandoned its existing commitments. Teams continue to deploy to Africa, the Middle East, and other regions, working with partner forces to disrupt violent extremist organizations. This ongoing counter-terrorism role serves a dual purpose: it maintains operational readiness and preserves hard-won regional relationships that will matter in GPC competition for influence.
This “win the current fight” imperative also reflects a reality of special operations: you can’t simply stop one war and start preparing for another. The transition must happen while the force continues to operate in current conflicts.
Line 2: Accelerate the Transition to Great Power Competition
This is where the heaviest lifting happens. Accelerating the GPC transition means adapting forces, training curricula, and equipment procurement specifically for high-end conflict against peer adversaries. It means asking a fundamentally different question than the CT era posed: instead of “How do we find and kill a terrorist network?” the question becomes “How do we give the fleet and joint force a decisive advantage against an adversary with sophisticated sensors, integrated air defenses, and advanced naval forces?”
The answers involve new training pipelines, new operating concepts, new technology investments, and new relationships with conventional naval forces.
Line 3: Transform for the Future
The long-range investment line involves developing capabilities, experimenting with emerging technologies, and building an organizational culture of innovation. Howard emphasized that NSW must be a “learning organization” — one that not only adapts to today’s threat but anticipates tomorrow’s.
Maritime Special Operations in the GPC Era: Roles and Capabilities
The operational implications of this transition are significant and specific. Here’s how SEALs and SWCC are actually contributing to the Great Power Competition mission.
Integration with Carrier Strike Groups and Amphibious Ready Groups
One of the most visible and consequential changes has been the systematic embedding of NSW elements — both SEALs and SWCC — into Carrier Strike Group (CSG) and Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) training exercises.
Historically, NSW operated with considerable independence from the conventional fleet. In the CT era, SEAL teams were typically attached to joint task forces conducting named operations, not sailing with the battle fleet. That’s changing. NSW teams now train alongside CSGs and ARGs, developing the shared understanding, communication protocols, and tactical proficiency needed to integrate seamlessly in a fleet engagement scenario.
This integration produces something more valuable than just training reps. It generates new Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) — the detailed operational playbooks that govern how units fight together. When a SEAL team and a carrier strike group have actually exercised together in contested environments, they understand each other’s capabilities, limitations, and communication preferences. That understanding is irreplaceable in combat.
Distributed Maritime Operations: NSW’s Core GPC Concept
Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO) is perhaps the single most important operational concept shaping how NSW plans to fight in the GPC era. DMO envisions dispersing naval forces across vast maritime areas — rather than concentrating them where they’re vulnerable to adversary A2/AD systems — and having those distributed units conduct coordinated operations with mutual support.
For NSW, DMO means operating small, agile teams from austere, dispersed locations across the Indo-Pacific or other contested maritime regions. Rather than staging from large, conspicuous bases, SEAL and SWCC elements would operate from forward-positioned platforms, island facilities, or host-nation locations, providing continuous forward presence and capability.
NSW’s specific contributions to DMO include:
– Persistent ISR: Providing the fleet with continuous intelligence from locations conventional sensors can’t reach or that adversary systems can’t easily detect.
– Enabling Sea Control: Conducting operations that support the broader fleet’s ability to control critical maritime areas, chokepoints, and straits.
– Forward Presence: Maintaining a continuous, low-profile presence in strategically significant areas that signals commitment and generates intelligence.
– Target Development: Identifying, tracking, and cueing high-value targets for fleet strike assets.
Advanced Special Reconnaissance in Contested Environments
Special reconnaissance has always been a SEAL core competency. In the GPC era, it takes on dramatically heightened importance — and difficulty. Operating against a near-peer adversary like China means conducting ISR in environments where adversary surveillance is pervasive, electronic emissions can be detected and geolocated, and conventional ISR platforms (aircraft, satellites) may be contested.
SEAL SR teams operating in these environments must rely on exceptional tradecraft, minimal electronic signatures, and deep knowledge of adversary surveillance patterns to accomplish their missions. The intelligence they gather — on adversary positions, capabilities, logistics, and patterns of behavior — is operationally irreplaceable. Satellites and drones can tell you what’s there. Human operators on the ground can tell you what it means.
Naval Irregular Warfare: Competition Below the Threshold
Naval Irregular Warfare (NIW) represents one of NSW’s most strategically significant contributions to GPC. NIW encompasses operations designed to compete with adversaries below the threshold of conventional armed conflict — precisely the gray zone where China and Russia have proved most adept at advancing their interests.
NIW activities include building the maritime special operations capacity of partner nations, conducting information operations in maritime regions, disrupting adversary influence networks, and maintaining persistent access in strategically vital areas. When China uses its maritime militia to harass Philippine fishing boats in the South China Sea, or when Russia conducts ambiguous naval operations in the Arctic, NIW provides tools for responding without triggering escalation to conventional conflict.
This is arguably where SEALs and SWCC operating alongside regional partners — training coastguard forces, conducting joint maritime exercises, building intelligence networks — deliver some of their highest strategic value.
Precision Direct Action in Support of Fleet Objectives
Direct action remains a core NSW capability, but its application in the GPC context differs from the CT era. Rather than targeting terrorist leaders or facilitators, GPC-era DA missions might focus on neutralizing adversary sensors or command nodes critical to an A2/AD network, disabling key maritime infrastructure to enable fleet maneuver, or conducting time-sensitive strikes against targets that conventional platforms can’t reach covertly.
SWCC provides the mobility that makes these missions possible. Their specialized craft — designed for high speed, low radar cross-section, and shallow-water access — can insert SEAL teams into coastal areas where larger platforms simply cannot operate.
Maritime Interdiction and Partner Capacity Building
MIO remains a critical NSW mission set in the GPC context. Interdicting vessels carrying advanced weapons components, enforcing maritime sanctions, and supporting partner nations’ counter-smuggling efforts all serve GPC objectives. Perhaps more importantly, NSW’s FID role — training and advising partner nation maritime forces — builds the regional network of capable allies that the U.S. needs to sustain long-term competition.
Challenges Confronting NSW in the GPC Era
The transition isn’t without serious obstacles. Understanding the challenges is as important as understanding the capabilities.
Operating in Contested, Sensor-Rich Environments
The most fundamental challenge is environmental. Counter-terrorism operations typically occurred in environments where U.S. forces enjoyed overwhelming air and maritime superiority. GPC adversaries, particularly China, have invested precisely in denying that superiority.
Operating in a sensor-dense, electronically contested environment demands a fundamentally different approach to tactics and equipment. NSW teams must minimize their electromagnetic signature, plan routes that exploit adversary sensor gaps, and assume that adversary surveillance is far more capable than anything they faced in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Logistical Demands at Scale
Distributed Maritime Operations across the Indo-Pacific — the world’s largest ocean — present logistical challenges of a different order of magnitude than sustaining teams in the Middle East. Fuel, weapons, medical support, communications infrastructure, and personnel resupply across thousands of miles of contested ocean require sophisticated logistics planning that NSW is actively developing.
Evolving Training Requirements
Preparing SEAL and SWCC operators for high-end conflict means more than adding new skill blocks to existing training pipelines. It requires a fundamental reassessment of what competencies matter most. Electronic warfare awareness, cyber operations, advanced maritime navigation, multi-domain coordination, and foreign language skills suited for the Indo-Pacific region all demand attention. The training pipeline, from BUD/S through SEAL Qualification Training and SWCC’s crewman qualifications, must evolve to reflect these new realities.
Technological Integration
NSW is actively pursuing unmanned systems integration — Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs), Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs), and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) — to extend ISR range, reduce risk to operators, and create a more capable sensor network. Developing stealth technologies for SWCC craft, advanced low-probability-of-intercept communications, and cyber capabilities specifically suited to maritime SOF operations are all active areas of investment.
The challenge is matching the pace of commercial and adversary technological development while maintaining the operational security needed to protect sensitive capabilities.
Recruiting and Retaining Technical Talent
The personnel challenge is particularly acute. The GPC era demands operators with not only the physical and mental toughness that has always defined NSW, but also deep technical expertise in areas like signals intelligence, cyber operations, and autonomous systems. Finding individuals who combine these technical aptitudes with the attributes needed to survive BUD/S and SWCC selection — and retaining them against competitive private sector offers — is an ongoing institutional challenge.
The Indo-Pacific: NSW’s Primary Theater
While NSW must maintain global capability, the Indo-Pacific is clearly the primary GPC theater. The region’s geography — vast ocean distances, thousands of islands, numerous critical chokepoints (Malacca Strait, Luzon Strait, Taiwan Strait), and a constellation of treaty allies and partners — is almost custom-built for maritime special operations.
China’s A2/AD network extends across this region, creating the very contested maritime environment that NSW’s new capabilities are designed to penetrate. Allied partners like the Philippines, Japan, Australia, and Indonesia all have maritime special operations communities that NSW can train, advise, and operate alongside. The forward positioning of NSW elements in the Indo-Pacific — embedded with partner forces, deployed aboard fleet platforms, or operating from distributed shore facilities — represents a fundamental component of the U.S. regional strategy.
The Army SOF community has also recognized this maritime imperative, with Army Special Forces increasingly training for littoral and riverine operations that complement NSW’s capabilities. This joint SOF approach — SEAL teams handling deep maritime penetration, SWCC providing maritime mobility, and Army SOF building partner capacity among archipelagic partner nations — represents the integrated approach the GPC strategic environment demands.
The Future of Naval Special Warfare
Howard’s vision for NSW’s long-term transformation goes beyond tactical adaptation. It envisions a force that is deeply integrated with the conventional fleet, technologically sophisticated, globally networked with partner SOF communities, and organizationally agile enough to operate across the full spectrum of competition — from peacetime partner engagement to high-end naval conflict.
Several trajectories seem clear:
– Unmanned systems will play an increasingly central role, extending the reach and persistence of NSW without always putting operators in harm’s way.
– The fleet integration model will deepen, with NSW elements becoming a more permanent and organic component of carrier and amphibious formations.
– Naval Irregular Warfare will expand, as the gray zone remains the most active arena of U.S.-China and U.S.-Russia competition.
– Technology and cyber capabilities will become as central to NSW operations as demolitions and close-quarters combat were in earlier eras.
– Partner network development will be a sustained strategic investment, building the relationships and capabilities that give the U.S. a coalition advantage in any regional contingency.
NSW has navigated profound transitions before. From the Underwater Demolition Teams of World War II to the Cold War special operations renaissance to the post-9/11 CT surge, naval special warfare has repeatedly demonstrated the institutional resilience to transform when strategy demands it. The current transition is arguably the most complex — requiring simultaneous adaptation of doctrine, technology, training, and organizational culture against multiple peer adversaries. But the foundation is solid, and the urgency is clear.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Navy SEALs and Special Boat Teams?
Navy SEALs are the combat operators — trained for direct action, special reconnaissance, unconventional warfare, and counter-terrorism. Special Boat Teams are composed of Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewmen (SWCC), who operate specialized maritime craft to insert, extract, and support SEALs and other SOF. Think of SEALs as the assault element and SWCC as the precision maritime mobility force that gets them there and back.
Why is Great Power Competition a bigger challenge than counter-terrorism for NSW?
Counter-terrorism operations typically occurred against adversaries with limited military technology, no air forces, and no naval power. Great Power Competition involves adversaries like China and Russia with advanced sensors, anti-ship missiles, electronic warfare capabilities, and sophisticated intelligence networks. This requires NSW to operate with far greater stealth, in denied environments, and with much more complex coordination with conventional forces.
What is Distributed Maritime Operations and how do SEALs contribute to it?
Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO) is a naval concept that disperses forces across wide maritime areas to avoid presenting concentrated targets to adversary long-range weapons. SEALs and SWCC contribute by operating from small, dispersed forward locations to provide persistent intelligence, enable fleet targeting, and conduct naval irregular warfare — all without the large, detectable footprint of conventional forces.
When were Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewmen (SWCC) officially established?
SWCC was officially established on April 16, 1987, though its roots trace back to the Vietnam War-era “Brown Water Navy” riverine operations that demonstrated the value of specialized combatant craft in special operations.
What types of craft do Special Boat Teams operate?
Modern Special Boat Teams operate the Combatant Craft Assault (CCA) for high-speed covert infiltration, the Combatant Craft Medium (CCM) for extended patrol and heavier weapons support, and the Special Operations Craft – Riverine (SOC-R) for inland waterway operations. Each platform is optimized for speed, low profile, and operating in shallow coastal or riverine environments.
How is NSW training changing to prepare for Great Power Competition?
NSW training is evolving to include greater emphasis on electronic warfare awareness, operating with minimal electromagnetic signature, advanced maritime navigation, multi-domain coordination (cyber, space, information), and language skills relevant to the Indo-Pacific region. The focus is shifting from the close-quarters combat and direct action skills that dominated the CT era to the complex, multi-domain proficiency needed against peer adversaries.
—
The “race for relevancy” that Rear Adm. Howard described isn’t a crisis — it’s an adaptation, one that the most elite maritime special operations force in the world is well-positioned to win. The same qualities that made Navy SEALs and Special Boat Teams effective against terrorist networks — adaptability, precision, unconventional thinking, and extraordinary professionalism — are exactly what Great Power Competition demands in the maritime domain. The mission has changed. The men and women of Naval Special Warfare are changing with it.